Romulus Augustus: Life, Rule, and Death of the Last Roman Emperor

Romulus Augustus, often remembered as the last Roman emperor of the Western Roman Empire, stands as a significant figure in the annals of history. His reign, though brief, symbolizes the end of an era in ancient Rome.

Unlike the long reigns of many emperors before him, Romulus Augustus’ time as emperor was short-lived, but his impact on the Roman world was undoubtedly great.

Known to some as Romulus Augustulus, which diminutively means “little Augustus,” his rule offers a glimpse into the turbulent period marking the conclusion of the Roman Empire in the West.

Table of Contents

Early Life of Rome’s Last Emperor

Romulus Augustus, affectionately dubbed Romulus Augustulus or “little Augustus,” embarked on life’s journey in a time of significant upheaval. As the young son of the patrician Orestes, a former Roman army officer and later magister militum (master of soldiers), young Romulus’ early years were steeped in the complexities of late Roman Empire politics and military affairs. His father, Orestes, wielding considerable influence, played a key role in shaping his son’s future as the emperor of the Western Roman Empire.

Born into the twilight years of the Roman Empire, Romulus’ ascent to the imperial throne was less a result of his own ambition and more a consequence of his father Orestes’ maneuvers within the Roman military and political spheres. Orestes, having served under the Eastern Roman Emperor Zeno as a diplomat, understood the intricate balance between the Eastern and Western Roman Empires. However, his allegiance firmly rested with the West, where he sought to establish his young son as the emperor.

Rise to Power

His rise to power was orchestrated by his father Orestes, a prominent Roman army officer and magister militum. Orestes’ influence and military acumen were crucial in paving the way for his son’s elevation to the imperial throne.

Before Romulus Augustus’ rise, the Western Roman Empire was experiencing significant internal turmoil and external threats from barbarian tribes. Orestes, having served the Eastern Roman Empire under Emperor Zeno as a diplomat, returned to the West with considerable military experience and connections. He leveraged these to garner support within the Western Roman Army, positioning himself as a key power broker.

The crucial moment came when Orestes led a military rebellion against the then-reigning Western Roman Emperor, Julius Nepos, in 475 AD. Orestes’ forces managed to oust Nepos, who fled to southern Gaul, leaving a power vacuum in the Western Empire. Rather than assume the title of emperor himself, Orestes decided to install his young son, Romulus Augustus, as the new emperor. This decision was likely made to legitimize his own control over the empire while using his son as a figurehead, a puppet ruler under his influence.

Thus, Romulus Augustus’ rise to power was not through traditional succession or personal achievement but rather through the military and political machinations of his father Orestes. This background set the stage for his reign during one of the most turbulent periods in the history of the Western Roman Empire.

Romulus Augustus as the Emperor

Romulus Augustulus’ ascension to the throne was a result of complex political maneuvering and power struggles within the Roman Empire. However, his reign was short-lived and largely symbolic.

Romulus Augustulus’s Father Played a Role in His Rule

Romulus Augustus became emperor through the actions of his father Orestes, who, after leading a military revolt against Julius Nepos, the last Western Roman emperor recognized by the Eastern Roman Empire, placed his son on the imperial throne. Orestes used his influence within the Roman army and his position as magister militum to declare Romulus, his son, as the new emperor of the Western Empire. This move was strategic, aiming to consolidate his power while presenting a legitimate front through his son’s rule.

Romulus Augustus was exceptionally young for an emperor, ascending to the imperial throne around the age of 15 or 16. His youth earned him the nickname “Romulus Augustulus” or “little Augustus,” highlighting his status as a boy emperor. Despite the grand title of emperor, Romulus’ youth and inexperience meant that the actual control of the empire lay in the hands of his father Orestes, and other Roman military leaders, who acted as the power behind the throne during his brief reign.

Plans and Achievements

Despite his brief tenure as the emperor of the Western Roman Empire, Romulus Augustus’ impact is more symbolic than the significant military or political achievements that characterize it. His reign is often cited as the end of the ancient Roman Empire in the West, marking a key moment in Western European history. However, focusing on his specific actions and plans, there is little recorded about substantial reforms or achievements due to the very short duration of his rule and his young age.

Romulus Augustus was known more for the circumstances surrounding his rise and fall than for any particular policies or military campaigns he initiated. Being a puppet ruler under the control of his father, Orestes and other military leaders, his ability to enact significant change or leave a lasting legacy through achievements was severely limited. The Western Roman Empire was in a state of severe decline by the time of his ascension, with reduced territories, diminished military power, and significant political instability.

The Abdication

The abdication of Romulus Augustus is an important event that marks the end of the Western Roman Empire and symbolizes the transition from Roman to barbarian rule in Western Europe. This moment was not a result of a singular decision by Romulus Augustus himself but rather the culmination of various factors, including military defeat, political compulsion, and the changing dynamics of power within the empire.

In 476 AD, Odoacer, a Germanic chieftain and leader of the mercenary forces within the Roman army, led a revolt against the Roman Empire. The discontent among the barbarian troops, primarily over land distributions and broken promises by the Roman leadership, especially Romulus’ father Orestes, catalyzed this uprising. Odoacer’s forces quickly overcame the Roman military resistance, leading to the capture of Ravenna, the then-capital of the Western Roman Empire, where Romulus Augustus resided.

The situation Romulus Augustus faced was dire. He was young, reportedly only around 16 years old, with no real military or political power of his own. His role had largely been ceremonial, with the actual control of the empire being managed by his father Orestes, and other military leaders. With Orestes defeated and killed, Romulus was left without any support against Odoacer’s forces.

The abdication of Romulus Augustus was thus a forced surrender under the threat of violence and the reality of Odoacer’s control over the capital. Odoacer presented Romulus with no viable alternative but to step down from the imperial throne. This moment is critical because it was not merely a personal defeat for Romulus but a symbolic end to the centuries-old institution of the Roman emperor in the West. Odoacer’s decision to spare Romulus suggests a recognition of the symbolic power of the emperor figure, even as he dismantled the political structure that supported it.

The abdication is also notable for its lack of violence towards Romulus Augustus himself, a rarity in the often brutal political transitions of the era. Odoacer’s approach to dealing with Romulus — forcing him to abdicate but allowing him to live — reflects a nuanced understanding of the situation. It was a way to legitimize his own rule by eliminating the threat of a Roman resurgence under a figurehead like Romulus while avoiding the potential backlash that might have arisen from harming the young emperor.

The Fall of Rome and Romulus Augustus

The fall of the Roman Empire was a gradual decline that marked the end of ancient Rome’s dominance, culminating in 476 AD when the Western Roman Empire officially ended. This downfall was the result of a combination of factors that eroded the empire’s foundations over time. Economic troubles played a significant role, as the empire faced severe financial strain due to overspending, reliance on slave labor, which stifled innovation, and a debasement of currency that led to inflation.

Politically, the empire became plagued by instability and corruption. The system of succession for Roman emperors lacked clarity, leading to frequent power struggles and civil wars that drained resources and weakened central authority. Additionally, the expansion of the empire had brought vast territories under its control that were increasingly difficult to govern effectively, exacerbating administrative challenges.

Militarily, the Roman legions, once unrivaled, faced declining discipline and loyalty, partly due to the growing reliance on mercenary forces with little allegiance to Rome. The empire’s borders were constantly under threat from barbarian tribes, such as the Visigoths and Vandals, who breached Roman defenses and sacked cities, including Rome itself, in 410 AD.

Late Life

After his forced abdication, Romulus Augustus’ life took a turn towards obscurity, a stark contrast to the pomp and circumstance that typically surrounded Roman emperors. Odoacer, after seizing control, sent Romulus into exile rather than executing him. This act of clemency allowed Romulus to retire from public life, living out his days far from the political turmoil that had defined his brief reign.

Romulus Augustus was most probably relegated to live in the Castle of Lucullanum in Campania, Southern Italy.

The Death of the Last Roman Emperor

The circumstances surrounding the death of Romulus Augustus, the last Roman emperor of the Western Empire, are largely unknown due to the scant historical records from this tumultuous period. What is known is that Romulus lived out his life in relative obscurity after his abdication and subsequent exile to the Castle of Lucullanum.

The lack of detailed historical accounts leaves much about Romulus Augustus’ final days and death to speculation. It is presumed that he lived a life far removed from the political and military struggles that had defined his reign and the era of Roman dominion. The exact date and cause of his death remain unrecorded, making it a subject of historical curiosity rather than documented fact.

Roman Empire after Romulus Augustus

After the abdication of Romulus Augustus, the Western Roman Empire did not see the rise of another emperor. Instead, Odoacer declared himself the ruler of Italy, marking the end of the Roman Empire in the West as a political entity. Odoacer chose not to assume the title of emperor, but rather took on the role of King, signifying a clear break from the traditional Roman imperial governance model.

This transition did not mean the end of Roman influence in Western Europe. Odoacer and his successors maintained various Roman administrative practices and legal traditions, blending them with their own Germanic customs. However, the absence of a Roman emperor in the West led to the fragmentation of authority, with various Germanic kings and leaders establishing their own kingdoms in the territories that were once part of the Western Roman Empire.

In the Eastern part of the empire, known as the Byzantine Empire, Eastern Roman Emperor Zeno continued to rule, maintaining the legacy of the Roman Empire in the East. The Byzantine Empire would continue for nearly another millennium, preserving many aspects of Roman culture, law, and governance, even as the West moved into what is historically known as the Early Middle Ages.

The Roman Senate, a vestige of the Roman Republic and Empire, continued to exist in a reduced role under Odoacer and later rulers.

Romulus the First vs Romulus Augustus

Comparing Romulus, the legendary first king of Rome, to Romulus Augustulus, the last Roman emperor, is like looking at the very start and the very end of a long story. Romulus started Rome with big dreams, making it a place with its own rules and ways of doing things. He’s a hero in many stories, showing what people admire about starting something new. Romulus Augustulus, on the other hand, was in charge when Rome wasn’t doing so well, and his time ended when a leader from another place took over.

The name Romulus, being at both the start and end of Rome’s story, is interesting. It’s like the story of Rome is a big circle, beginning and ending with someone of the same name. This makes you think about how things change over time but also kind of stay the same. The first Romulus is about the excitement of starting something, and the last Romulus is about saying goodbye to it.

Even though their stories are very different, having the same name, Romulus, makes you link them together.

Legacy and Historical Significance

The legacy of Romulus Augustus and his reign as the last Roman emperor of the Western Empire is significant for several reasons. Firstly, his rule symbolizes the end of an era; the fall of Romulus Augustus is often marked as the definitive end of the ancient Roman Empire in the West. This moment is considered a milestone in the transition from antiquity to the Middle Ages in Western Europe.

Romulus Augustus, despite his short and largely ineffectual reign, remains a historical figure of interest due to the symbolic nature of his position as the last emperor. His story encapsulates the decline and fall of the Western Roman Empire, highlighting the challenges it faced from internal strife, economic difficulties, and external pressures from barbarian tribes.

The aftermath of Romulus’ abdication also underscores the shift in power dynamics within the region. Odoacer’s rule and the subsequent rise of various Germanic kingdoms represent the fragmentation of the once-unified Roman Empire into separate entities that would evolve into the nations of Europe.

Moreover, the end of the Western Roman Empire under Romulus Augustus paved the way for the Byzantine Empire to carry on the Roman legacy in the East, influencing the development of Eastern Europe and the Islamic world. The Byzantine Empire’s preservation of Roman law, culture, and Christian religion would have a lasting impact on European history, serving as a bridge between the ancient and medieval worlds.

References

https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.AT.5.103187

Heather, P. (1995). The Huns and the End of the Roman Empire in Western Europe. The English Historical Review, 110(435), 4–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/573374

Reynolds, R. L., & Lopez, R. S. (1946). Odoacer: German or Hun? The American Historical Review, 52(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1845067

Bachrach, B. S. (1969). ANOTHER LOOK AT THE BARBARIAN SETTLEMENT IN SOUTHERN GAUL. Traditio, 25, 354–358. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27830877

Walter Goffart. (1981). Rome, Constantinople, and the Barbarians. The American Historical Review, 86(2), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/1857439