Pompey the Great: The Last Hero of the Roman Republic

Pompey the Great, a name that resonates through the annals of Roman history, was a military and political leader whose actions profoundly influenced the final years of the Roman Republic. His life, filled with ambitious achievements and a tumultuous end, marked the culmination of an era and the beginning of another.

Early Life and Early Career

Born in 106 BCE in Picenum, Italy, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (Pompey the Great) was not of noble birth but emerged from a wealthy Italian family. His early career was marked by his service under his father, Pompeius Strabo, in the Social War (91–88 BCE). Pompey demonstrated military prowess from a young age, showing an innate ability for leadership and strategy that set the stage for his illustrious career.

READ MORE: The Most Important Roman Wars and Battles: Civil and External

Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus was born into an era of significant turmoil and transformation within the Roman Republic. The period leading up to and surrounding his birth was marked by the rise of powerful military leaders and the increasing use of armies loyal to commanders rather than the state, setting a precedent that Pompey himself would later follow. His early exposure to military life under his father, Pompeius Strabo, a competent general in his own right, provided Pompey with a unique insight into the complexities of Roman military and political strategies.

READ MORE: The Roman Army and Roman Army Tactics

The Social War, in which Pompey first served under his father, was a crucial conflict between Rome and several of its Italian allies, known as the Socii, who sought Roman citizenship and equal rights. The war’s significance in Roman history cannot be understated, as it eventually led to the extension of citizenship to all Italian allies south of the Po River, fundamentally changing the Roman Republic’s social and political fabric. Pompey’s participation in this war, even at a young age, would have imbued him with a profound understanding of the stakes involved in Roman politics and the importance of military might in securing political objectives.

Moreover, Pompey’s early career is notable for his ability to distinguish himself in a time when personal allegiance and military success were becoming the primary means of achieving political power. His early endeavors on the battlefield were not merely exercises in martial skill but also in loyalty and strategic acumen, as he navigated the complex allegiances and rivalries that characterized the late Republic.

Pompey’s upbringing in Picenum, an area known for its wealth and strategic importance, played a significant role in shaping his early career. Picenum provided Pompey with a power base independent of the traditional aristocracy centered in Rome. This independence was critical in allowing Pompey the freedom to pursue his ambitions without being overly tied to the interests and machinations of the Roman elite. His ability to raise his own troops in Picenum at a young age is a testament to his leadership and the respect he commanded among his peers and the local population.

This period of Pompey’s life laid the foundation for his rise to power. His early experiences under his father’s command and his active participation in the Social War were instrumental in developing his military skills and understanding of Roman politics. These experiences, combined with his strategic use of his family’s wealth and influence in Picenum, positioned Pompey as a formidable figure in Roman public life, setting the stage for his future achievements and challenges.

Pompey’s Achievements

Pompey the Great was renowned for his significant military victories and his role in expanding the Roman Republic. His achievements include the decisive conquest of the Piracy threat in the Mediterranean, securing the Roman grain supply, and his successful campaigns in the East, notably in Judea and Pontus, which expanded Rome’s territories and influence.

The Mediterranean Sea was the lifeblood of the Roman Republic, facilitating trade, communication, and military movements. However, by the late 1st century BCE, piracy had become a rampant problem, threatening the security of Rome’s grain supply and the safety of its citizens. Pompey’s campaign against the pirates in 67 BCE was not just a military endeavor; it was a logistical and organizational triumph. He was granted extraordinary powers by the Lex Gabinia to clear the seas of pirates within three months. Employing a divide-and-conquer strategy, he divided the Mediterranean into distinct zones, each patrolled by a fleet under one of his lieutenants. This systematic approach allowed for the swift and efficient eradication of the piracy threat, a testament to Pompey’s understanding of both naval warfare and the importance of securing economic lifelines for Rome.

Pompey’s campaigns in the East, particularly in Judea and Pontus, were marked by both military prowess and diplomatic finesse. In Judea, Pompey’s intervention in the Hasmonean civil war and his siege of Jerusalem in 63 BCE extended Roman influence into the region and laid the groundwork for the future Roman province of Judaea. This campaign was not just a military conquest but also a significant political move, demonstrating Rome’s ability to impose its will far beyond its traditional borders.

In Pontus, Pompey’s victory over King Mithridates VI was a crucial moment in Rome’s eastern expansion. Mithridates, who had been a persistent thorn in Rome’s side through the Mithridatic Wars, was finally defeated, and his kingdom was incorporated into the Roman Republic. Pompey’s success in these regions showcased his strategic acumen and his ability to integrate newly conquered territories into the Roman fold, enhancing Rome’s power and prestige in the eastern Mediterranean.

Pompey’s efforts to secure the Roman grain supply were critical in stabilizing Rome’s food resources. The grain supply was the Republic’s Achilles’ heel, with Rome heavily reliant on imports from provinces like Egypt and the North African coast. By tackling piracy and ensuring the safety of grain shipments, Pompey not only secured Rome’s immediate food supply but also demonstrated the importance of controlling key maritime routes and granaries. This foresight helped to stabilize Rome’s internal politics by alleviating food shortages that could lead to unrest and provided a model for future Roman leaders on the importance of logistical control in empire management.

Pompey’s achievements had lasting impacts on the Roman Republic and the broader Mediterranean world. His military campaigns and political strategies contributed to the expansion of Roman territories, the stabilization of its borders, and the securing of vital trade routes. Furthermore, his actions laid the groundwork for the transition from Republic to Empire, showcasing the power and potential of individual military commanders within the Roman state. Pompey’s legacy is thus characterized not only by his immediate successes but also by his contributions to the shaping of Roman imperial strategy and administration in the centuries that followed.

READ MORE: The Complete Roman Empire Timeline: Dates of Battles, Emperors, and Events and The Roman Empire

Becoming a General

Pompey’s military genius was recognized early when he aligned himself with Sulla during the civil war against Marius’ faction. By the age of 23, he had raised his own army in Picenum, earning the title “Magnus” (the Great) from Sulla and solidifying his reputation as a formidable general.

Pompey’s decision to align with Lucius Cornelius Sulla, a prominent Roman general and statesman, during the latter’s conflict with Gaius Marius and his supporters, was a key moment in Pompey’s career. This period, known as the Sullan civil wars, was characterized by intense and brutal conflicts that pitted the optimates, favoring oligarchic rule and represented by Sulla, against the populares, who advocated for the power of the plebeian assemblies and were led by Marius. Pompey’s choice to side with Sulla was not merely a military decision but a calculated political move that positioned him favorably within the power structures of the Republic.

At the remarkably young age of 23, Pompey demonstrated his exceptional leadership and organizational skills by raising his own army in Picenum, his native region. This was no small feat, as it required not only the charisma and leadership to inspire loyalty and trust but also the logistical capability to arm, supply, and train a fighting force. The fact that Pompey could accomplish this independently highlights his personal reputation, influence in Picenum, and strategic insight to leverage his resources and connections. This army became a crucial asset in Sulla’s campaign to regain control of Rome and suppress the Marian factions.

The sobriquet “Magnus,” meaning “the Great,” was bestowed upon Pompey by Sulla himself, a testament to the young general’s military achievements and his role in Sulla’s victory. This honor not only acknowledged Pompey’s contributions on the battlefield but also cemented his status as a formidable military leader in the eyes of his contemporaries and the Roman Senate. The granting of this title was both an acknowledgment of Pompey’s past services and a portent of his future potential within the Roman military hierarchy.

Pompey’s early successes under Sulla’s banner were just the beginning of his illustrious military career, but they played a crucial role in solidifying his reputation as a general. By aligning himself with the victorious Sullan regime, Pompey positioned himself advantageously within the political and military structure of the Republic. His actions during this period showcased not only his tactical and strategic military capabilities but also his adeptness in navigating the complex political landscape of Rome. Pompey’s rise was not merely the result of martial skill but also of his ability to understand and manipulate the intricate dynamics of power and allegiance in the late Roman Republic.

This early phase of Pompey’s career laid the groundwork for his subsequent military campaigns and political endeavors. His achievements during this time were a harbinger of the significant impact he would continue to have on Roman military and political affairs, foreshadowing the role he would play in the events leading to the end of the Roman Republic and the dawn of the Imperial era.

From Consul to the Triumvirate

Pompey’s political aspirations led him to Rome’s highest offices. He became consul in 70 BCE, alongside Crassus, and again in 55 BCE. His importance to the first triumvirate, formed with Julius Caesar and Crassus in 60 BCE, was paramount. Pompey contributed military strength and political influence while seeking mutual support for their respective agendas. This alliance was crucial in securing Caesar’s command in Gaul and Pompey’s interests in the East.

Pompey’s first consulship in 70 BCE, alongside Marcus Licinius Crassus, marked a significant milestone in his political career. This position of power was a reflection of his military successes and his growing influence within the Roman political sphere. The consulship allowed Pompey to implement reforms and policies that would solidify his standing among the Roman elite and the populace alike. His tenure as consul was characterized by efforts to balance the power dynamics in Rome, navigating between the interests of the Senate and the equities (equestrian order), showcasing his political dexterity.

The formation of the First Triumvirate in 60 BCE, a political alliance with Julius Caesar and Crassus, was a strategic move by Pompey to consolidate his power and secure his interests. This unofficial coalition was based on a mutual understanding that each member would support the others’ ambitions. For Pompey, the Triumvirate offered a way to ensure the ratification of his eastern settlements and maintain his influence over Roman affairs, despite the opposition from the Senate.

Pompey brought significant military strength and political influence to the Triumvirate. His achievements in the East and his command of loyalty from legions of soldiers provided the alliance with the martial prowess necessary to back their political maneuvers. Moreover, Pompey’s vast network of clients and allies across the Republic bolstered the Triumvirate’s position within Roman society, enhancing their ability to push through their respective agendas.

The Triumvirate functioned on the principle of quid pro quo; Pompey’s support for Caesar’s command in Gaul was reciprocated by Caesar’s backing of Pompey’s eastern settlements and land distributions for his veterans. This mutual support extended to Crassus, who sought and received backing for his own political and financial interests. The alliance thus served as a powerful bloc that could effectively counterbalance the Senate’s authority and pursue their collective and individual objectives.

The establishment of the Triumvirate had profound implications for Roman politics. It represented a shift away from the traditional republican mechanisms of governance towards a more personalized form of political power. The alliance effectively circumvented the Senate’s opposition, allowing its members to achieve their goals through mutual support and cooperation. This period in Pompey’s career highlights his role as a key player in the transformation of the Roman Republic’s political landscape, setting the stage for the eventual rise of the Roman Empire.

Pompey and the Plebs

Pompey’s relationship with the Roman plebeians was complex. While initially seen as a champion of the people, his later career showed a shift towards the senatorial elite. However, his earlier reforms, efforts to secure grain supplies, and successful military campaigns earned him considerable popularity among the plebs.

At the outset of his career, Pompey’s military successes and efforts to address the concerns of the plebeians garnered him widespread acclaim among Rome’s lower classes. His early campaigns, particularly those aimed at eradicating piracy and securing the grain supply, directly benefited the plebeians by stabilizing food prices and ensuring a steady supply of grain to Rome. These actions were critical in a city where food security was a perennial concern and could quickly lead to unrest among the populace.

Pompey’s engagement with the plebeians was also reflected in his support for various reforms and public works that sought to improve the lives of the common people. His backing of laws that restored some powers to the tribunes of the plebs, who were representatives of the plebeian class, demonstrated his willingness to engage with and support the interests of the lower classes. Additionally, Pompey’s construction projects, including the building of theaters and other public venues, contributed to his popularity by enhancing the cultural and social life of Rome, making him a patron of the people in more ways than one.

Despite his early popularity among the plebeians, Pompey’s later career saw a gradual realignment towards the senatorial elite. This shift was partly a strategic move, as aligning with the Senate offered Pompey a more stable power base in the increasingly tumultuous political arena of the late Republic. However, this realignment alienated some of his plebeian supporters, who viewed it as a betrayal of their interests in favor of the aristocratic class. This complex balancing act between the plebeians and the senatorial elite underscores the challenges Pompey faced in navigating the Republic’s fragmented political landscape.

Notwithstanding the shifts in his political alliances, Pompey’s earlier reforms and military victories continued to endear him to a significant portion of the plebeian population. His legacy among the plebs was that of a leader who had once championed their causes and contributed to Rome’s glory through his military conquests.

Later Career

Pompey’s later career is often defined by his intense and ultimately fatal rivalry with Julius Caesar, marking a significant period in Roman history that contributed to the end of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. This period, fraught with political maneuvers, shifting alliances, and military confrontations, underscores the complexities of Roman political life and the personal ambitions that could alter the course of history.

The First Triumvirate, an alliance formed for mutual benefit between Pompey, Caesar, and Crassus, began to unravel following the death of Crassus in 53 BCE at the Battle of Carrhae. Crassus’s demise left Pompey and Caesar as the two dominant figures in Roman politics, without a mediating force to balance their competing ambitions. The Triumvirate’s disintegration was accelerated by the death of Julia, Pompey’s wife and Caesar’s daughter, in 54 BCE, which severed the personal bond that had helped to maintain their political alliance.

As Caesar’s military successes in Gaul grew, so did his popularity and power, causing concern among the Senate and Pompey, who began to view Caesar’s rising influence as a direct threat to the stability of the Republic and his own position within it. The Senate, wary of Caesar’s ambitions and seeking to curtail his power, aligned more closely with Pompey, who was increasingly seen as a defender of the Republic’s traditional values and institutions against Caesar’s perceived autocratic tendencies.

The rivalry reached its climax when Caesar, defying the Senate’s order to disband his army and return to Rome as a private citizen, crossed the Rubicon River in 49 BCE, a direct challenge to Pompey and the Senate’s authority. This act of defiance marked the beginning of a civil war between Caesar and the forces loyal to Pompey. Pompey, despite his military prowess and the resources at his disposal, was unable to mount an effective defense against Caesar’s advance, leading to his retreat to Greece, where he hoped to gather forces sufficient to oppose Caesar.

The conflict between Caesar and Pompey culminated in the Battle of Pharsalus in 48 BCE. Despite having a larger army, Pompey’s forces were decisively defeated by Caesar’s legions. The defeat at Pharsalus was a turning point in Pompey’s career, marking the end of his aspirations for control of Rome and forcing him into flight to seek refuge and support in the East.

Pompey’s later career, characterized by his rivalry with Caesar, reflects the tumultuous nature of Roman politics in the late Republic, where personal ambition and military might often dictated the course of events. Despite his ultimate defeat and the tragic end to his life, Pompey’s impact on Roman history remains significant.

Pompey and Julius Caesar

The late Roman Republic was marked by significant social and political upheaval, with power increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few individuals. This period saw the rise of strong military leaders who commanded loyalty from their armies independent of the state. The political environment was ripe for conflict as ambitious leaders like Pompey and Caesar sought to navigate and manipulate the Republic’s institutions for personal and political gain.

Both Pompey and Caesar were accomplished military commanders with significant victories that enhanced their status within Rome. Pompey’s successes against the pirates in the Mediterranean and his campaigns in the East had made him a hero in Rome, while Caesar’s conquests in Gaul brought him wealth, fame, and an army fiercely loyal to him alone. Their military achievements set the stage for their political rivalry, as each sought to leverage their successes to gain power within the Republic.

The Roman Senate, wary of the growing power of both Pompey and Caesar, played a significant role in exacerbating their rivalry. By granting extraordinary commands and honors to each, the Senate inadvertently fueled the competition between them. Additionally, the Senate’s actions, such as demanding Caesar’s return to Rome without his army, were seen as attempts to curb their power, further deepening the divide between the state’s leading figures and pushing them toward conflict.

External events, such as the death of Crassus and Julia, played crucial roles in the deterioration of Pompey and Caesar’s relationship. The death of Crassus removed a key member of the Triumvirate who had served as a balance between Pompey and Caesar’s ambitions. Julia’s death severed a personal tie that had helped maintain a semblance of unity between the two leaders. These events contributed to the breakdown of political alliances and set the stage for open conflict.

The civil war between Pompey and Caesar was not just a struggle for power but a conflict that would determine the future direction of the Roman Republic. Caesar’s crossing of the Rubicon and the subsequent battles were important moments that highlighted the inability of the Republic’s institutions to manage the ambitions of its leading figures. The war’s outcome, with Caesar emerging victorious, marked the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of a new era under imperial rule.

Pompey’s Death in Egypt

The demise of Pompey the Great in Egypt marks a poignant and historically significant event, reflecting the brutal realities of power politics in the ancient world. After his defeat at the Battle of Pharsalus, Pompey sought sanctuary in Egypt, a decision influenced by his previous connections to the Ptolemaic kingdom. During his earlier campaigns in the East, Pompey had interactions with the Ptolemaic dynasty, which likely contributed to his belief that Egypt would offer him refuge.

Upon Pompey’s arrival, Egypt was embroiled in its own internal strife, with the young King Ptolemy XIII and his advisers engaged in a power struggle with his sister, Cleopatra VII. The advisers, including the eunuch Pothinus and the general Achillas, were effectively ruling in the king’s name and faced the delicate task of navigating between the warring Roman factions. Their decision to assassinate Pompey was calculated to curry favor with Caesar, who they anticipated would emerge as the dominant power in Rome.

The manner of Pompey’s assassination was particularly treacherous and ignoble, given his status as a Roman consul and general. As Pompey disembarked in Egypt, he was greeted not with the sanctuary he sought but with violence. Historical accounts suggest that he was stabbed to death on September 28, 48 BCE, in sight of his wife, Cornelia, and son, who were aboard the ship that had brought him to Egypt. This act of betrayal underscored the ruthlessness of ancient power politics and the precarious position of those who found themselves on the losing side of such conflicts.

Julius Caesar’s reaction to Pompey’s assassination is a notable aspect of this historical episode. Upon arriving in Egypt shortly after the event and being presented with Pompey’s head, Caesar was reportedly not pleased. Instead of satisfaction, Caesar showed disgust and dismay at the manner of Pompey’s death. This reaction can be attributed to several factors, including respect for Pompey as a former ally and Roman dignitary, as well as Caesar’s understanding of the potential political ramifications of such a brutal act. Caesar’s response also highlighted the complex personal and political relationships that characterized the Roman Republic’s final years.

Pompey’s death marked the end of an era in Roman history. It symbolized the definitive close of the Republic’s tumultuous final decades and the beginning of the transition to the Roman Empire under Caesar and his successors. Furthermore, Pompey’s assassination in a foreign land, far from Rome, underscored the increasingly international nature of Roman political and military conflicts.

Pompey’s Legacy

Pompey the Great’s legacy is full of military brilliance, political ambition, and the inevitable downfall. His life reflects the complexities and turbulent nature of the late Roman Republic. Despite his ultimate defeat, Pompey’s contributions to Rome’s expansion and his role in the republic’s political dramas cemented his place as one of its most significant figures. His story is a poignant reminder of the fleeting nature of power and the end of an era in Roman history.

Pompey the Great: A Pillar of Rome’s Transition

Pompey the Great’s life story, marked by remarkable triumphs and a dramatic fall, highlights the volatile shift from the Roman Republic to the Empire. His confrontations with Julius Caesar reveal the precarious nature of power and alliances in Rome’s political landscape. Despite his demise, Pompey’s contributions to Rome’s expansion and stability immortalize him as a key architect in the annals of its history, epitomizing the intricate dance of ambition and the impermanence of power.

How to Cite this Article

There are three different ways you can cite this article.

1. To cite this article in an academic-style article or paper, use:

James Hardy, "Pompey the Great: The Last Hero of the Roman Republic", History Cooperative, June 28, 2021, https://historycooperative.org/pompey-the-great/. Accessed May 18, 2024

2. To link to this article in the text of an online publication, please use this URL:


3. If your web page requires an HTML link, please insert this code:

<a href="https://historycooperative.org/pompey-the-great/">Pompey the Great: The Last Hero of the Roman Republic</a>

Leave a Comment