The February Revolution, a key moment in Russian history, marked the beginning of a period of political and social upheaval that would lead to the end of the Romanov dynasty and set the stage for the Bolshevik Revolution later that year.
Table of Contents
Causes of the February Revolution
The February Revolution was primarily caused by a combination of long-term social and economic discontent compounded by the immediate pressures of World War I. The Russian Empire, at the turn of the 20th century, was marked by widespread dissatisfaction among its diverse population due to severe economic hardship, political repression, and slow progress on needed reforms.
READ MORE: What Caused World War 1? Political, Imperialistic, and Nationalistic Factors
The roots of the Russian Revolution can be traced back to the deep-seated discontent among the Russian populace, stemming from autocratic rule, poor working conditions, and the lack of political freedoms. This general dissatisfaction was amplified by the acute hardships brought about by Russia’s involvement in World War I, which exacerbated food shortages, led to staggering military losses, and drained the country’s economic resources.
World War I played a significant role in causing the February Revolution. The war placed an immense strain on Russia’s already weak economy, leading to severe food and fuel shortages. The Russian army suffered devastating defeats, and morale was at an all-time low, both among the troops and the general population. The war’s demands highlighted the incompetence of the Tsarist regime’s leadership and acted as a catalyst, bringing the underlying social and economic issues to a boiling point.
The immediate trigger for the revolution was the severe winter of 1916-1917, combined with the government’s failure to address the basic needs of its citizens, leading to mass protests and strikes in Petrograd (now Saint Petersburg), the capital of the Russian Empire at the time.
Time and Location
The February Revolution took place in March 1917 according to the Gregorian calendar, which Russia adopted later. The discrepancy between the Julian calendar, then in use in Russia, and the Gregorian calendar used elsewhere explains why it is referred to as the February Revolution. This event was primarily concentrated in Petrograd, the capital of the Russian Empire at the time, now known as Saint Petersburg.
Petrograd was the heart of Russia’s political and social life, housing the seat of government and the monarchy. The city’s status as the capital made it a focal point for the unrest. It was here that the striking workers, soldiers, and common people first gathered and demonstrated, leading to a significant uprising against the Tsarist regime.
The dense urban setting facilitated the rapid spread of revolutionary ideas and allowed for the mass mobilization of protestors. Additionally, Petrograd’s position as a major industrial and military hub meant that the effects of the war and economic hardships were acutely felt by its inhabitants, further fueling the discontent that led to the revolution.
The location of Petrograd, with its strategic importance and concentration of military forces, also played a critical role in the revolution’s success.
February/Russian Revolution: Course of Events
The February Revolution, also known as the February Bourgeois Democratic Revolution, was a series of events that took place in Russia in 1917, ultimately leading to the overthrow of the Romanov dynasty and the establishment of a provisional government.
Nicholas II and World War I
Tsar Nicholas II’s reign saw the Russian Empire embroiled in World War I, a conflict that would have profound implications for his rule and the stability of the nation. Initially, the war was met with a wave of patriotic fervor, with the Russian populace rallying behind their Tsar. However, as the war dragged on, the initial enthusiasm waned, replaced by despair and frustration over the continued hardships and losses. Nicholas II’s decision to take personal command of the Russian army in 1915 was a crucial moment that directly linked him with the military failures that followed. This decision not only removed him from the political decision-making process in Petrograd but also made him personally responsible for the defeats on the battlefield.
The lack of competent leadership and the Tsar’s insistence on maintaining autocratic control exacerbated the situation. Under Nicholas II’s command, the Russian military faced significant setbacks, including disastrous losses to German forces. The Russian army, ill-equipped and poorly led, suffered from low morale, high casualty rates, and desertions. These military failures not only undermined the Tsar’s authority but also contributed to the growing discontent among the soldiers and the general population, who bore the brunt of the war’s demands.
Furthermore, Nicholas II’s absence from the capital and his subsequent inability to address the internal issues exacerbated the political and social unrest. The Tsar’s disconnect from the realities of the war and the suffering of his people fueled resentment and opposition to his rule. This discontent was not confined to the battlefield or the urban working class but spread throughout the empire, creating a fertile ground for revolutionary ideas.
The combination of military defeats, economic strain, and political ineptitude under Nicholas II’s leadership directly contributed to the erosion of support for the monarchy and paved the way for the revolutionary movements that would eventually topple his regime.
World War I and the Russian Revolution
World War I was a catalyst for the Russian Revolution, accelerating the existing social, economic, and political tensions within the Russian Empire. The immense strain of the war effort highlighted the inefficiencies of the Tsarist regime and exacerbated the suffering of the Russian people. The severe shortages of food, fuel, and basic necessities, compounded by the staggering losses on the front, deepened the despair and anger against the government. The war’s impact on the Russian economy was devastating, leading to inflation, unemployment, and a significant decline in living standards, which hit the urban working class and peasants particularly hard.
The war also played a crucial role in undermining the loyalty of the Russian army, a key pillar of the Tsarist regime’s support. As the conflict progressed, the morale among Russian soldiers plummeted due in part to the lack of adequate supplies, the perceived incompetence of their leaders, and the senseless slaughter on the Eastern Front. The spread of defeatism and revolutionary ideas among the troops, coupled with the direct impact of military failures on the home front, created a volatile situation. The linkage between the front lines and the political heart of the empire became a conduit for revolutionary sentiment, with soldiers increasingly sympathetic to the cause of change.
Moreover, World War I precipitated a political crisis that exposed the inadequacies of the Tsarist government and its inability to govern effectively in times of extreme hardship. The pressures of the war magnified the demands for political reform, leading to increased support for revolutionary groups that opposed the autocratic system. The establishment of the Petrograd Soviet alongside the Provisional Government following the abdication of Nicholas II was a direct consequence of the political vacuum left by the discredited monarchy. This “dual power” arrangement reflected the profound impact of World War I on the Russian political landscape, setting the stage for the Bolsheviks’ eventual seizure of power and the creation of a socialist state.
Rasputin and the Czarina
Grigori Rasputin’s relationship with the Czarina Alexandra played a controversial and significant role in the backdrop of the Russian Revolution. As Russia was engulfed in the turmoil of World War I and the Tsar was often away at the front, Rasputin gained unprecedented access to the royal family due to his alleged healing abilities concerning the heir, Alexei, who suffered from hemophilia.
His influence over the Czarina led to a perception of Rasputin as the de facto ruler of Russia, especially in matters of state appointments and dismissals. This perception exacerbated the already widespread discontent among the Russian populace and the aristocracy, who viewed Rasputin’s involvement in government affairs as emblematic of the corruption and incompetence of the imperial regime. The scandalous rumors surrounding Rasputin’s personal life and his influence over the Czarina undermined the credibility of the monarchy and fueled the revolutionary fervor that was building against the autocratic rule of Nicholas II.
READ MORE: Who was Grigori Rasputin? The Story of the Mad Monk Who Dodged Death
Rasputin’s assassination in December 1916 by a group of nobles reflects the desperation of the Russian elite to regain control and restore stability to the government. However, his death did little to halt the growing crisis. Instead, it highlighted the deep fractures within Russian society and the ruling class. The Czarina’s reliance on Rasputin had significantly weakened the Romanov dynasty’s standing among all social classes, from the peasantry to the elites. This erosion of support was a critical element that contributed to the eventual fall of the Tsarist regime.
Alexander Kerensky
Alexander Kerensky emerged as a key figure in the turbulent period leading up to and following the February Revolution. As a member of the Duma and a leader within the Socialist Revolutionary Party, Kerensky was instrumental in the formation of the Provisional Government, where he initially served as the Minister of Justice. His dynamic oratory and commitment to reform made him a popular figure among those who sought a democratic alternative to the autocratic Tsarist regime.
Kerensky’s actions during this critical juncture were driven by his desire to maintain Russia’s involvement in World War I while also attempting to navigate the country toward constitutional democracy. His dual role in both the Petrograd Soviet and the Provisional Government exemplified the complex “dual power” arrangement that characterized this period of Russian history, embodying the tensions between revolutionary aspirations and the practicalities of governing a nation at war.
However, Kerensky’s tenure as the head of the Provisional Government, especially after becoming Prime Minister, was marked by significant challenges that ultimately undermined his authority and the viability of the government he led. His decision to continue Russia’s participation in World War I was deeply unpopular among the war-weary Russian population, leading to widespread disillusionment and anger.
Additionally, Kerensky’s inability to effectively address the pressing issues of land reform and workers’ rights further alienated the peasantry and the urban working class, key constituencies whose support was crucial for the stability of the government.
His efforts to suppress the Bolsheviks and other radical elements through military force backfired, leading to increased sympathy for these groups and contributing to the conditions that enabled the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917.
Bolshevik Revolution
The Bolshevik Revolution, an important event in the Russian Revolution of 1917, marked the overthrow of the Provisional Government and the establishment of Bolshevik rule, leading to the eventual formation of the Soviet Union. This revolution was characterized by a series of events that culminated in the seizure of power by the Bolshevik Party, led by Vladimir Lenin.
The timeline of the Bolshevik Revolution began with the growing dissatisfaction among the Russian population due to the ongoing hardships of World War I, food shortages, and the failure of the Provisional Government to address pressing social and economic issues. In October 1917 (Julian calendar), leveraging the widespread unrest and the support of the Petrograd Soviet and the military, particularly the Petrograd garrison, the Bolsheviks launched a coup, storming the Winter Palace and arresting members of the Provisional Government.
This strategic move by the Bolsheviks was not merely a spontaneous uprising but a well-orchestrated plan to capture key locations and institutions in Petrograd. The revolution’s success was largely due to the Bolsheviks’ ability to garner support from soldiers, workers, and sailors, disillusioned by the Provisional Government’s inability to end the war and address economic inequalities.
The critical role played by the Petrograd Soviet, alongside the Bolsheviks’ promise of “Peace, Land, and Bread,” resonated with the masses, facilitating the rapid consolidation of Bolshevik power. Following the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks moved quickly to withdraw Russia from World War I, redistributing land among the peasantry and nationalizing industries, setting the stage for the profound transformations that would follow in Russian society.
Russian Civil War
The Russian Civil War, which ensued from 1918 to 1921, was a multifaceted conflict that followed the Bolshevik Revolution, pitting the new Bolshevik government (the Reds) against a coalition of anti-Bolshevik forces known as the Whites, which included monarchists, nationalists, and foreign powers.
This period was marked by widespread violence, severe food shortages, and massive societal upheavals across the former Russian Empire. The Whites, initially supported by countries from Western Europe and other regions, aimed to overthrow the Bolsheviks and restore the old order or establish a new government. The conflict was further complicated by the involvement of various nationalist movements seeking independence and the emergence of the Green armies, peasant groups who opposed both the Reds and the Whites primarily due to the Bolsheviks’ requisitioning policies and the Whites’ conservative aims.
The Civil War was characterized by significant military engagements, brutal guerrilla warfare, and mass atrocities committed by both sides. The Bolsheviks, led by figures such as Leon Trotsky, who organized the Red Army, managed to secure crucial support from workers and peasants, partly by promising land reforms and workers’ rights. Despite facing numerous challenges, including the Allied intervention on behalf of the Whites and internal dissent, the Bolsheviks’ strategic and ideological coherence, coupled with their control over central Russian territories and resources, eventually led to their victory.
The consolidation of Bolshevik power at the end of the Civil War laid the groundwork for the establishment of the Soviet government and the restructuring of Russian society along socialist lines.
End and Outcome
After the February Revolution, a significant series of events reshaped Russia and had a profound impact on the course of world history. The immediate aftermath of the revolution saw the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the end of over three centuries of Romanov dynasty rule. This monumental shift paved the way for the establishment of the Provisional Government, which aimed to steer Russia towards a more democratic and liberal political system.
However, the Provisional Government faced immense challenges, including continuing the Russian war effort in World War I, dealing with widespread social and economic issues, and managing the political unrest that permeated Russian society.
The Provisional Government, led by figures such as Prime Minister Alexander Kerensky, struggled to meet the demands of the Russian people, who were disillusioned by ongoing food shortages, the toll of the war, and the slow pace of promised reforms. This period of dual power, with the Petrograd Soviet wielding significant influence alongside the Provisional Government, highlighted the deep divisions within Russia. The inability of the Provisional Government to withdraw Russia from the First World War and address the root causes of discontent led to lost faith among most Russians, setting the stage for the Bolshevik Revolution in October 1917.
Led by Vladimir Lenin, the Bolsheviks seized power, marking a crucial moment in the Russian Revolutions of 1917. This shift led to the establishment of a Soviet government, which aimed to create a socialist state. The Bolsheviks’ actions, including withdrawing Russia from the First World War and redistributing land and resources to the workers and peasants, represented a radical departure from the previous regime. However, these changes also precipitated the Russian Civil War, a brutal conflict that would further shape the newly formed Soviet Union’s future.
The outcomes of the February Revolution and the subsequent Bolshevik takeover had far-reaching impacts on the modern world. The establishment of the Soviet Union marked the emergence of a new geopolitical entity that would play a central role in global affairs throughout the twentieth century. The ideological divide between the capitalist West and the communist East, exemplified by the Soviet Union, led to the Cold War, significantly influencing international relations, military conflicts, and economic policies across the globe.
Moreover, the Russian Revolution inspired a wave of revolutionary movements worldwide, as workers, peasants, and colonized peoples sought to challenge existing power structures and demand more equitable societies. The legacy of the revolution, in terms of promoting ideas about social justice, equality, and the rights of the working class, continues to influence political thought and activism.
References
Alexander III. 1917. Moscow, Russia. Print.
Emperor Nicholas II. 1917. St. Petersburg, Russia. Print.
“February Revolution Begins in Russia.”History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2014.
Fleming, Candace. The Family Romanov: Murder, Rebellion & the Fall of Imperial Russia. Schwartz & Wade, 8 July 2014. Print.
Russian Revolution. 1917. St. Petersburg, Russia. Print.
Siegalbaum, Lewis. “1917: February Revolution.”February Revolution. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2014.
“Why Was There A Disaster in 1917?” JohnDClare. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2014.