While divorce perhaps doesn’t have the same stigma connected to it as it once did, the practice is still a touchy subject in many parts of America. Indeed, as we will see throughout the article, it has changed drastically in law as well as in the attitudes of the general population across the history of the country.
What was once a forbidden practice and only every used as a last resort is now very common. The medium length for a marriage in the US these days is around 11 years and divorce rates have been rising steadily throughout the 20th century and some 29% of marriages will suffer some form of ‘disruption’ and in many cases lead to a divorce.
However how has divorce law changed over time?
Even before the United States officially became the nation that we know it as today divorce was a hot topic in the colonies.
One of the earliest instances of a divorce law was in the Colony of Massachusetts Bay who actually created a judicial tribunal that dealt with divorce matters in 1629. This legislative body was allowed to grant divorces on the basis of adultery, desertion, bigamy and in many cases impotence as well. In the North the colonies adopted their own approaches that made divorce available whereas the southern colonies did all they could to prevent the act even if they did have legislation in place.
After 1776 divorce law was actually less restrictive. Hearing divorce cases took the legislature away from what they deemed as more important work so it was handed to the judiciary where it remains today. The big problem at the time, for women at least, was that they were basically a legal non-entity in the sense that it was difficult for them to claim ownership of property or financial assets which worked against them in the case of a divorce.
The Married Women’s Property Acts in 1848 went some way to rectifying this however throughout the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries divorce remain fairly uncommon if we think of how much it is used today and women were at a tremendous disadvantage from the get go.
Early 20th Century
By the end of the 18th century there were numerous ‘divorce mill’ states or places such as Indiana, Utah, and the Dakotas where you could go and get a divorce. Many towns provided accommodation, restaurants, bars and events centered on this trade. In 1887 Congress ordered the first compilation fo divorce statistics at a federal level to see how big the ‘problem’ had become.
The Inter-Church Conference on Marriage and Divorce which was held in in 1903 in an attempt to use religion to ensure that divorce was kept at a minimum. However with the onset of feminism and the general relaxation of views towards divorce from a societal and moral stand point the practice was gaining traction.
In the 1920’s trial marriages were established that allowed a couple of try out a marriage without actually being married, not having kids or any lifelong financial commitments. In a way it was simply two people of the opposite sex living in the same quarters however for the time it was a new concept and was one of the first ways in which the law tried to accommodate prenuptial contracts. In fact marriage counseling was beginning to become popular as well and represented the recognition that a problem existed even if they law did not strictly prohibit it.
The Family Court
As the years rolled by and the nation found itself embroiled in two world wars, divorce took a back seat as far as lawmakers were concerned. However the Family Court system that started in the 1950’s was the first time in decades that the legislature and judicial system in the US tackled the divorce issue.
For years, couples had to go through the traditional court system to get a divorce or at least plead their case to do so. However with new laws in the place that established the Family Court, this created a way for judges to essentially ratify agreements between couples for divorce that had been created beforehand. While the law used to ensure that a case had to be heard in a court of law this now changed.
With these changes, law firms specialising in divorce started appearing all over the country – San Francisco, Chicago, New York, and just about every other large city soon became involved in these family courts.
No Fault Divorces
Possibly the biggest change to divorce law in the United States in its history came with no fault divorces in the 1970’s. Up until now there still had to be a party at fault. Even in the Family Courts there was still a need for an adulterer or such like to be identified and then for the terms of the divorce to be agreed however with the change in the law then a divorce could be granted if neither party was at fault.
California actually led the way in 1969 however it wasn’t until the 1970’s that other states (Iowa being the second) adopted the law. In many respects it was enacted to bring down the cost of divorce in terms of hiring lawyers and expensive court fees with drawn out trials although that didn’t really come to fruition. Divorce lawyers and financial advisors all still profited greatly from divorce proceedings even if both parties simply wanted to split and move on.
Something that this change in the law didn’t focus on was child custody and it still remained a neglected topic. Laws to address this included:
- The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act in 1968
- Parent Kidnapping Act in 1980
- The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction in 1986
While the law has attempted to create a fair an equal child custody process it still isn’t quite right in many respects and even with the legislation that has been enacted over the years there remains work to do.
Modern Day America
Divorce towards the end of the 20th century and into the early 21st century was a much different proposition from a hundred years ago.
While there are new laws being enacted all the time to deal with the finer points of divorce the no fault legislation essentially changed everything about the practice and made it into the divorce proceedings that we know today. That being said the attitudes towards divorce are still traditional in many quarters. Even though it has been set in law and that, in general at least, the stigma around divorce has gone it still plays a major role in affected a child’s upbringing and other societal problems.
Furthermore the equal share of property and finances is something else that the law is still trying to get right. Although this differs from state to state across the United States of America in most cases who is to blame doesn’t always transfer over to who gets the property. The legislature and the court system are still trying to find a balance in modern day America between a system that allows for divorce without needing evidence of wrong doing and one that is fair and equal while also addressing the child factor as well.
It isn’t easy but there is still a lot of work behind the scenes to address it.
Divorces were being carried out before the United States of America was even a nation. The colonies had their own measures and laws for dealing with such things however for centuries they were largely used in extreme cases. Indeed, up until the No Fault rule it was unusual to see a divorce that was granted on the basis that both parties simply wanted to break up.
This happens fairly regularly these days however back then there generally had to be a reason of some sort behind the divorce – a women cheating on a man for instance or a man having several wives.
The big question now is whether or not the law can develop even further and change with the rising divorce cases across the country and the more complicated financial and property ownership models. Up until now at least divorce law in the United States has developed at a fairly fast rate. It might not always have favored the couple given that much of the early legislation was there to deal with extreme cases that were even frowned upon by the religious orders of the day.
Divorce law was very reactionary and has been throughout the past 300 years aside from a few isolated cases. It is still adapting to a growing trend however while the stigma of divorce has largely vanished in many places the law is still trying to keep up.